In Re Discipline of Ryan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In Re Discipline of Ryan

130 N.W.2d 534, 269 Minn. 577, 1964 Minn. LEXIS 819

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedSeptember 25, 1964

Docket39623

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 130 N.W.2d 534 (In Re Discipline of Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Discipline of Ryan, 130 N.W.2d 534, 269 Minn. 577, 1964 Minn. LEXIS 819 (Mich. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This proceeding was commenced by the State Board of Law Examiners for the disbarment of respondent, Frank Patrick Ryan, an attorney at law duly licensed to practice in the State of Minnesota. It appears from the petition of the board that Frank Patrick Ryan has been, since September 1, 1921, duly licensed to practice law in the State of Minnesota; that on March 25, 1964, respondent was indicted by the grand jury for the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, for the crime of murder in the first degree; that on August 5, 1964, respondent appeared in open court and entered a plea of guilty and was duly adjudged guilty of the crime of murder in the second degree and committed by order of the district court to the commissioner of corrections until he should be discharged by due process of law. Attached to the petition of the Board of Law Examiners is a certified photocopy of the indictment and the judgment roll.

Now Therefore, Pursuant to the rules of this court, it is hereby ordered that respondent, Frank Patrick Ryan, be and he hereby is disbarred and his name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This proceeding was commenced by the State Board of Law Examiners for the disbarment of respondent, Frank Patrick Ryan, an attorney at law duly licensed to practice in the State of Minnesota. It appears from the petition of the board that Frank Patrick Ryan has been, since September 1, 1921, duly licensed to practice law in the State of Minnesota; that on March 25, 1964, respondent was indicted by the grand jury for the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, for the crime of murder in the first degree; that on August 5, 1964, respondent appeared in open court and entered a plea of guilty and was duly adjudged guilty of the crime of murder in the second degree and committed by order of the district court to the commissioner of corrections until he should be discharged by due process of law. Attached to the petition of the Board of Law Examiners is a certified photocopy of the indictment and the judgment roll.

Now Therefore, Pursuant to the rules of this court, it is hereby ordered that respondent, Frank Patrick Ryan, be and he hereby is disbarred and his name shall be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this state.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 N.W.2d 534, 269 Minn. 577, 1964 Minn. LEXIS 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-discipline-of-ryan-minn-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack