In re Discipline of Ronning

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Discipline of Ronning

130 N.W.2d 533, 269 Minn. 576, 1964 Minn. LEXIS 818

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedSeptember 25, 1964

DocketNo. 39,476

StatusPublished

This text of 130 N.W.2d 533 (In re Discipline of Ronning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Discipline of Ronning, 130 N.W.2d 533, 269 Minn. 576, 1964 Minn. LEXIS 818 (Mich. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This proceeding was commenced by the State Board of Law Examiners by service upon respondent, H. Leigh Ronning, on June 22, 1964, of a petition and accusation, together with an order of the supreme court requiring respondent to answer the accusations contained therein within 20 days after such service. It having been made to appear to the court by the affidavit of the attorney for the board that no answer to said petition has been received and no other pleadings have been served or filed by respondent and that he is now in default,

Now Therefore, Pursuant to the rules of this court, it is hereby ordered that said respondent, H. Leigh Ronning, be and he hereby is disbarred and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This proceeding was commenced by the State Board of Law Examiners by service upon respondent, H. Leigh Ronning, on June 22, 1964, of a petition and accusation, together with an order of the supreme court requiring respondent to answer the accusations contained therein within 20 days after such service. It having been made to appear to the court by the affidavit of the attorney for the board that no answer to said petition has been received and no other pleadings have been served or filed by respondent and that he is now in default,

Now Therefore, Pursuant to the rules of this court, it is hereby ordered that said respondent, H. Leigh Ronning, be and he hereby is disbarred and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this state.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 N.W.2d 533, 269 Minn. 576, 1964 Minn. LEXIS 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-discipline-of-ronning-minn-1964.