In re Disciplinary Proceeding No. 96-DB-042

692 So. 2d 1054, 1997 La. LEXIS 1307, 1997 WL 211693
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 24, 1997
DocketNo. 96-B-3085
StatusPublished

This text of 692 So. 2d 1054 (In re Disciplinary Proceeding No. 96-DB-042) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Disciplinary Proceeding No. 96-DB-042, 692 So. 2d 1054, 1997 La. LEXIS 1307, 1997 WL 211693 (La. 1997).

Opinion

In re Disciplinary Counsel LA.St.Bar;— Other(s); applying for Rule XIX, Section 12B, Immunity for Witnesses.

ORDER

Considering the application of the disciplinary counsel for immunity from criminal prosecution of witnesses in a disciplinary proceeding,

IT IS ORDERED that the application for immunity on the basis of Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 12 B is denied. However, the disciplinary counsel, together with the attorney general and the district attorney, may request an order from this court pursuant to Article 439.1 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure requiring the witnesses to give testimony or provide other information which they refuse to give or provide on the basis of their privilege against self-incrimination, such order to become effective as provided in Subsection C of that Article.

FOR THE COURT:

/a/ Chet D. Traylor Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
692 So. 2d 1054, 1997 La. LEXIS 1307, 1997 WL 211693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-proceeding-no-96-db-042-la-1997.