In re Disciplinary Action or Transfer to Disability Status against O'Neill

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Disciplinary Action or Transfer to Disability Status against O'Neill

527 N.W.2d 100, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 157, 1995 WL 63942

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedFebruary 10, 1995

DocketNo. C4-94-2621

StatusPublished

This text of 527 N.W.2d 100 (In re Disciplinary Action or Transfer to Disability Status against O'Neill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Disciplinary Action or Transfer to Disability Status against O'Neill, 527 N.W.2d 100, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 157, 1995 WL 63942 (Mich. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, a petition for disciplinary action alleging misconduct was filed in the above-entitled matter on December 23, 1994; and

WHEREAS, thereafter, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility and respondent Patrick H. O’Neill have entered into a stipulation dated November 29, 1994, which addresses the nature of the respondent’s condition and recommends to the court the transfer of respondent to disability inactive status without further proceedings; and

WHEREAS, the court accepts the parties’ stipulation;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that effective on the date of this order, respondent Patrick H. O’Neill be, and the same is, transferred to disability inactive status without further proceedings. All further proceedings in connection with the petition for disciplinary action are stayed' during the period of disability inactive status. The court imposes the conditions contained in that stipulation in their entirety, including that the reinstatement hearing provided for in Rules 18 and 28(d), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility is not waived, during which the allegations of misconduct by the Director shall be considered and that, as part of such reinstatement proceeding, a recommendation to appropriate disciplinary sanction, if any, shall be made to the court.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Esther M. Tomljanovich Esther M. Tomljanovich Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

WHEREAS, a petition for disciplinary action alleging misconduct was filed in the above-entitled matter on December 23, 1994; and

WHEREAS, thereafter, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility and respondent Patrick H. O’Neill have entered into a stipulation dated November 29, 1994, which addresses the nature of the respondent’s condition and recommends to the court the transfer of respondent to disability inactive status without further proceedings; and

WHEREAS, the court accepts the parties’ stipulation;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that effective on the date of this order, respondent Patrick H. O’Neill be, and the same is, transferred to disability inactive status without further proceedings. All further proceedings in connection with the petition for disciplinary action are stayed' during the period of disability inactive status. The court imposes the conditions contained in that stipulation in their entirety, including that the reinstatement hearing provided for in Rules 18 and 28(d), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility is not waived, during which the allegations of misconduct by the Director shall be considered and that, as part of such reinstatement proceeding, a recommendation to appropriate disciplinary sanction, if any, shall be made to the court.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Esther M. Tomljanovich Esther M. Tomljanovich Associate Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

527 N.W.2d 100, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 157, 1995 WL 63942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-or-transfer-to-disability-status-against-oneill-minn-1995.