In Re Disciplinary Action Against Zak

630 N.W.2d 427, 2001 Minn. LEXIS 473, 2001 WL 869263
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided July 26, 2001·No. C3-98-1923·Published

Opinion

ORDER

On August 31, 1999, this Court reinstated respondent Timothy Jay Zak to the practice of law following a 3-month suspension and placed him on supervised probation for 2 years. In re Reinstatement of Zak, 598 N.W.2d 692 (Minn.1999).

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility and respondent have entered into a stipulation wherein they jointly recommend that it would be appropriate to immediately discharge respondent from his supervised probation because respondent no longer maintains a law practice and his probation is an undue burden on his ability to register as a financial advisor in other states.

This court has independently reviewed the record and agrees that the jointly recommended discharge is appropriate.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Timothy Jay Zak is hereby discharged from supervised probation.

BY THE COURT

Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Zak, 630 N.W.2d 427, 2001 Minn. LEXIS 473, 2001 WL 869263 (Mich. 2001).

630 N.W.2d 427 (In Re Disciplinary Action Against Zak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Reinstatement to the Practice of Zak
598 N.W.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1999)