In Re Disciplinary Action Against Zak
This text of 630 N.W.2d 427 (In Re Disciplinary Action Against Zak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On August 31, 1999, this Court reinstated respondent Timothy Jay Zak to the practice of law following a 3-month suspension and placed him on supervised probation for 2 years. In re Reinstatement of Zak, 598 N.W.2d 692 (Minn.1999).
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility and respondent have entered into a stipulation wherein they jointly recommend that it would be appropriate to immediately discharge respondent from his supervised probation because respondent no longer maintains a law practice and his probation is an undue burden on his ability to register as a financial advisor in other states.
This court has independently reviewed the record and agrees that the jointly recommended discharge is appropriate.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Timothy Jay Zak is hereby discharged from supervised probation.
BY THE COURT
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
630 N.W.2d 427, 2001 Minn. LEXIS 473, 2001 WL 869263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-zak-minn-2001.