In re Disciplinary Action Against White

North Dakota Supreme Court

In re Disciplinary Action Against White

378 N.W.2d 678, 1985 N.D. LEXIS 443

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 19, 1985

DocketNo. 11114

StatusPublished

This text of 378 N.W.2d 678 (In re Disciplinary Action Against White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Disciplinary Action Against White, 378 N.W.2d 678, 1985 N.D. LEXIS 443 (N.D. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER OF SUSPENSION

Respondent attorney, James Evan White, filed an Affidavit pursuant to Rule 12, North Dakota Rules of Disciplinary Procedure wherein he acknowledged conduct in violation of certain provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility and acknowledged that he could not successfully defend himself if the matters were prosecuted. The Respondent voluntarily consented to discipline requested by the Disciplinary Board in its complaint against him.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, that James Evan White be suspended from the practice of law commencing at 4 p.m., January 17, 1986, with the privilege to apply for reinstatement on or after June 17, 1986.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Mr. White comply with the provisions of Rule 14, North Dakota Rules of Disciplinary Procedure.

RALPH J. ERICKSTAD,

Chief Justice

GERALD W. VANDE WALLE,

Justice

H.F. GIERKE III,

HERBERT L. MESCHKE,

BERYL J. LEVINE,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI