In re Disciplinary Action Against Walcott

830 N.W.2d 439, 2013 WL 2253732, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 272
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMay 16, 2013
DocketNo. A11-0224
StatusPublished

This text of 830 N.W.2d 439 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Walcott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Disciplinary Action Against Walcott, 830 N.W.2d 439, 2013 WL 2253732, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 272 (Mich. 2013).

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action seeking reciprocal discipline under Rule 12(d), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), based on an opinion of the Florida Supreme Court disbarring respondent Terry M, Fitzpatrick Walcott. Fla. Bar v. Walcott, 22 So.3d 69 (2009). The Florida disbarment was based on respondent’s misappropriation of client funds and other trust account violations, in violation of Rules 4 — 1.5(f)(5), 4-1.15, and 4-8.4(c) of the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct and Rules 5 — 1.1(a)(1), 5-l.l(b), 5-l.l(e), 5-1.1(f), and 5-1.2(b) of the Florida Rules Regulating Trust Accounts.

The Director and respondent have entered into a stipulation in which respondent admits the allegations in the petition for disciplinary action and waives his rights under Rule 12(d), RLPR. The [440]*440parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is disbarment.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Respondent Terry M. Fitzpatrick Walcott is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Minnesota, effective upon the date of filing of this opinion;

2. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of disbarment to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals); and

3. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs and disbursements pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/-

Alan C. Page Associate Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Bar v. Walcott
22 So. 3d 69 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
830 N.W.2d 439, 2013 WL 2253732, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-walcott-minn-2013.