In Re Disciplinary Action Against Vaught

637 N.W.2d 570, 2002 Minn. LEXIS 2, 2002 WL 24389
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJanuary 7, 2002
DocketC9-98-1330
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 637 N.W.2d 570 (In Re Disciplinary Action Against Vaught) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Vaught, 637 N.W.2d 570, 2002 Minn. LEXIS 2, 2002 WL 24389 (Mich. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed an amended petition for revocation of probation and for further disciplinary action alleging that respondent Samuel M. Vaught has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, engaging in a series of conflicts of interest, *571 failing to keep the required trust account books and records, misappropriation, failing to promptly return unearned fees, failing to seek court approval of a wrongful death settlement on behalf of minors and initially failing to cooperate with the discipline system in its investigation of a complaint filed against him in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.4, 1.7(b), 1.15, 1.16(d), 8.4(c) and 8.4(d).

Respondent admits his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives his rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is an indefinite suspension with no right to apply for reinstatement for three years from the date of this order and payment of $900 in costs and disbursements pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Samuel M. Vaught is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law with no right to apply for reinstatement for three years from the date of this order. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs and disbursements under Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

PAUL H. ANDERSON Associate Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Vaught
693 N.W.2d 886 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2005)
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Wingerd
637 N.W.2d 570 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
637 N.W.2d 570, 2002 Minn. LEXIS 2, 2002 WL 24389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-vaught-minn-2002.