In re Disciplinary Action Against Usumanu

903 N.W.2d 218
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 25, 2017
DocketA17-1495
StatusPublished

This text of 903 N.W.2d 218 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Usumanu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Disciplinary Action Against Usumanu, 903 N.W.2d 218 (Mich. 2017).

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers' Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Albert Isiaka Usumanu has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline by failing to (1) diligently represent a client; (2) communicate with a client; (3) deposit advance fees into trust, and (4) provide an accounting. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4(a)(3)-(4); 1.15(a), (c)(3), and (c)(5).

Respondent and the Director have entered into a stipulation for discipline. In it, respondent waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and unconditionally admits the allegations of the petition. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand.

This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Respondent Albert Isiaka Usumanu is publicly reprimanded; and
2. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR,

BY THE COURT:

/s/David R. Stras Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
903 N.W.2d 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-usumanu-minn-2017.