In re Disciplinary Action Against Usumanu

903 N.W.2d 218
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided October 25, 2017·No. A17-1495·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers' Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Albert Isiaka Usumanu has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline by failing to (1) diligently represent a client; (2) communicate with a client; (3) deposit advance fees into trust, and (4) provide an accounting. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4(a)(3)-(4); 1.15(a), (c)(3), and (c)(5).

Respondent and the Director have entered into a stipulation for discipline. In it, respondent waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and unconditionally admits the allegations of the petition. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand.

This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Respondent Albert Isiaka Usumanu is publicly reprimanded; and
2. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR,

BY THE COURT:

/s/David R. Stras Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Disciplinary Action Against Usumanu, 903 N.W.2d 218 (Mich. 2017).

903 N.W.2d 218 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Usumanu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.