In re Disciplinary Action Against Sungtaek Cho

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Disciplinary Action Against Sungtaek Cho

739 N.W.2d 424, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 617, 2007 WL 2949154

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 5, 2007

DocketNo. A07-1591

StatusPublished

This text of 739 N.W.2d 424 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Sungtaek Cho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Disciplinary Action Against Sungtaek Cho, 739 N.W.2d 424, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 617, 2007 WL 2949154 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon the application of the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, pursuant to Rule 12(c)(1), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and upon evidence that respondent Sungtaek Cho cannot be found in the state or served personally with the petition for disciplinary action,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Sungtaek Cho is suspended from the practice of law in Minnesota. Within one year from the date of this order, respondent may move for vacation of the order for suspension and for leave to answer the disciplinary petition. Respondent is advised that if he fails to appear in this matter within one year from the date this order is filed, the allegations in the petition for disciplinary action shall be deemed admitted.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon the application of the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, pursuant to Rule 12(c)(1), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and upon evidence that respondent Sungtaek Cho cannot be found in the state or served personally with the petition for disciplinary action,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Sungtaek Cho is suspended from the practice of law in Minnesota. Within one year from the date of this order, respondent may move for vacation of the order for suspension and for leave to answer the disciplinary petition. Respondent is advised that if he fails to appear in this matter within one year from the date this order is filed, the allegations in the petition for disciplinary action shall be deemed admitted.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

739 N.W.2d 424, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 617, 2007 WL 2949154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-sungtaek-cho-minn-2007.