In re Disciplinary Action against Strom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Disciplinary Action against Strom

526 N.W.2d 626, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 159, 1995 WL 63940

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided February 10, 1995·No. No. C4-94-1551·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon the application of the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility and upon evidence that respondent, Warren Elof Strom, cannot be found in the state or served personally with the petition for disciplinary action,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law. Respondent has 1 year from the date of this order to move for vacation of the order for suspension and for leave to answer the disciplinary petition.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ M. Jeanne Coyne M. Jeanne Coyne Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon the application of the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility and upon evidence that respondent, Warren Elof Strom, cannot be found in the state or served personally with the petition for disciplinary action,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law. Respondent has 1 year from the date of this order to move for vacation of the order for suspension and for leave to answer the disciplinary petition.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ M. Jeanne Coyne M. Jeanne Coyne Associate Justice

In re Disciplinary Action against Strom, 526 N.W.2d 626, 1995 Minn. LEXIS 159, 1995 WL 63940 (Mich. 1995).

Pincite

526 N.W.2d 626 (In re Disciplinary Action against Strom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.