In re Disciplinary Action Against Stolpestad

485 N.W.2d 711, 1992 Minn. LEXIS 399, 1992 WL 171585
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Disciplinary Action Against Stolpestad. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Minn. LEXIS 903
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided July 15, 1992·No. No. C0-89-1418·Published

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, by its order dated June 16, 1992, this court suspended Harold L. Stol-[712] pestad from the practice of law for a period of 30 days; and

WHEREAS, Harold L. Stolpestad has filed with this court an affidavit stating that he has complied fully with the requirements for reinstatement set forth in this court's order of June 16, 1992; and

WHEREAS, the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed with this court an affidavit certifying that Harold L. Stolpestad substantially has complied with the requirements for reinstatement set forth in this court’s order of June 16, 1992;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Harold L. Stolpestad is reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota effective July 15, 1992, at which time he shall be placed on supervised probation for a period of 2 years in accordance with the conditions enumerated by this court in its order of June 16, 1992.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Disciplinary Action Against Stolpestad, 485 N.W.2d 711, 1992 Minn. LEXIS 399, 1992 WL 171585 (Mich. 1992).

485 N.W.2d 711 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Stolpestad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.