In re Disciplinary Action Against Stockman
This text of 513 N.W.2d 256 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Stockman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Respondent, William L. Stockman, was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law and ineligible to apply for reinstatement for a period of not less than 2 years by opinion of this court filed July 2,1993. In re Disciplinary Action against Stockman, 502 N.W.2d 209 (Minn.1993). During that period of suspension, the Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed two supplementary petitions for discipline alleging additional instances of unprofessional conduct warranting public discipline.
[257]*257Respondent and the Director have entered into a stipulation wherein respondent acknowledges, and waives, his rights to hearings and admits the conduct alleged in the supplemental petitions, including noneooperation with the investigation by the Director’s office, failure to inform clients whom he was representing of his suspension, lack of diligence in that representation, and misappropriation of $25,000 of trust funds; conduct that the respondent and the Director agree warrant disbarment.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 15, Minnesota Rules of Lawyers Professional Responsibility that respondent, William L. Stock-man, is hereby disbarred from the practice of law.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall pay to the Director the sum of $750 in costs and $78 in disbursements, pursuant to Rule 24.
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
513 N.W.2d 256, 1994 Minn. LEXIS 178, 1994 WL 93950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-stockman-minn-1994.