In re Disciplinary Action Against Selmer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Disciplinary Action Against Selmer

619 N.W.2d 424, 2000 Minn. LEXIS 754, 2000 WL 1790102

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 29, 2000

DocketNo. C8-93-1638

StatusPublished

This text of 619 N.W.2d 424 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Selmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Disciplinary Action Against Selmer, 619 N.W.2d 424, 2000 Minn. LEXIS 754, 2000 WL 1790102 (Mich. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

In 1997, this court suspended Scott E. Selmer from the practice of law for 12 months for professional misconduct. See In re Selmer, 568 N.W.2d 702 (Minn.1997). The court conditioned reinstatement on compliance with Rules 18 and 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR). See id. at 705.

On October 24, 2000, Selmer filed a petition for reinstatement. However, there is no indication that he has complied with the requirements of Rules 18 and 26, RLPR.

NOW, THEREFORE, based on the records, files, and proceedings herein,

IT HEREBY IS ORDERED that Scott E. Selmer’s petition for reinstatement is denied. Selmer may file a new petition for reinstatement as provided by Rule 18, RLPR.

BY THE COURT

Alan C. Page Associate Justice

GILBERT, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI