In Re Disciplinary Action Against Scott

657 N.W.2d 567, 2003 Minn. LEXIS 120, 2003 WL 1090269
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMarch 4, 2003
DocketC9-03-260
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 657 N.W.2d 567 (In Re Disciplinary Action Against Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Scott, 657 N.W.2d 567, 2003 Minn. LEXIS 120, 2003 WL 1090269 (Mich. 2003).

Opinion

*568 ORDER

PAUL H. ANDERSON, Associate Justice.

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent John Dov Scott has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, respondent made false statements of fact to the court in his own marital dissolution and custody matter in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.3(a)(1), 8.4(c) and 8.4(d).

Respondent admits that his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives his rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLRP), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a 30-day suspension from the practice of law; compliance with Rule 26, RLPR, successful completion of the professional responsibility examination under Rule 18(e), RLPR within one year; and payment of $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR. The parties further recommend that respondent be reinstated following the expiration of the suspension provided that at least 15 days before the expiration of the suspension period, respondent files an affidavit with the Clerk of Appellate Courts and the Director’s Office establishing that respondent is current with Continuing Legal Education and has fully complied with Rules 24 and 26, RLPR.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent John Dov Scott is suspended from the practice of law for 30 days, effective 14 days from the date of this order, subject to the agreed-upon conditions set forth above. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs and disbursements under Rule 24, RLPR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Disciplinary Action Against Nwaneri
896 N.W.2d 518 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2017)
In re Disciplinary Action Against Amundson
869 N.W.2d 671 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2014)
In re Disciplinary Action Against Novak
856 N.W.2d 97 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2014)
In re Disciplinary Action Against Michael
836 N.W.2d 753 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2013)
In re Disciplinary Action Against Kalk
829 N.W.2d 366 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2013)
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Czarnik
759 N.W.2d 217 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
657 N.W.2d 567, 2003 Minn. LEXIS 120, 2003 WL 1090269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-scott-minn-2003.