In re Disciplinary Action against Sahr

446 N.W.2d 664, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 343, 1989 WL 122675
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedSeptember 28, 1989
DocketNo. C3-88-26
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 446 N.W.2d 664 (In re Disciplinary Action against Sahr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Disciplinary Action against Sahr, 446 N.W.2d 664, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 343, 1989 WL 122675 (Mich. 1989).

Opinion

ORDER

The above-entitled order comes before the court upon the affidavit of the Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility by Wendy Willson Legge, Senior Assistant Director.

WHEREAS, on August 25, 1989, the Minnesota Supreme Court publicly censured Roger T. Sahr and issued an order suspending him from the practice of law for 30 days and placing him on probation with conditions for three years following the expiration of his suspension;

WHEREAS, respondent paid disciplinary costs in the amount of $1,205.65 pursuant to Rule 24(a), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), to the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board;

WHEREAS, on September 7, 1989, Roger T. Sahr filed an affidavit of compliance and attached notices to clients with the Director, pursuant to Rule 26, RLPR;

WHEREAS, Roger T. Sahr has complied with the terms of the court’s August 25, 1989, suspension order and the Director has no objection to respondent’s reinstatement to the practice of law without the necessity of filing a petition for reinstatement;

WHEREAS, respondent is current in his continuing legal education requirements;

IT IS ORDERED that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law immediately and need not file a petition for reinstatement. Respondent is placed on three years probation pursuant to the court’s August 25, 1989, order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alevizos v. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COM'N
452 N.W.2d 492 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
446 N.W.2d 664, 1989 Minn. LEXIS 343, 1989 WL 122675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-sahr-minn-1989.