In re Disciplinary Action Against Petty

838 N.W.2d 562, 2013 WL 5872843, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 428
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 22, 2013
DocketNo. A13-0531
StatusPublished

This text of 838 N.W.2d 562 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Petty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Disciplinary Action Against Petty, 838 N.W.2d 562, 2013 WL 5872843, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 428 (Mich. 2013).

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Richard Wayne Petty committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline. The matter was referred to a referee. In the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation for discipline, the referee found that respondent failed to diligently represent a client, made multiple false statements to two clients and to a third party, forged a client’s signature on a document, submitted false or fraudulently obtained evidence to a court in two matters, failed to deposit client funds into his trust account, failed to keep required trust account books and records, offered monetary settlements conditioned on two former clients withdrawing their disciplinary complaints, failed to cooperate with disciplinary investigations, and made false statements to the Director. The referee concluded that respondent violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4(a)(3), 1.15(a), 3.3(a)(3), 4.1, 8.1(b), 8.4(c) and (d), and App. 1 thereto, and Rule 25, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR) and recommended that respondent be indefinitely suspended for a minimum of 2 years.

The parties then entered into a stipulation in which they agreed that the referee’s findings and conclusions are conclusive. They also waived their right to briefing and oral argument before this court. The parties recommended that the court impose the referee’s proposed discipline.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Richard Wayne Petty is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law, effective 14 days from the date of the filing of this order, with no right to petition for reinstatement for a minimum of 2 years from the date of this order. Respondent may petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 18(a)-(d), RLPR. Reinstatement is conditioned on successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination and satisfaction of continuing legal education requirements, pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals), and shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_

Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
838 N.W.2d 562, 2013 WL 5872843, 2013 Minn. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-petty-minn-2013.