In re Disciplinary Action Against Ornstein

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Disciplinary Action Against Ornstein

622 N.W.2d 560, 2001 Minn. LEXIS 139, 2001 WL 225709

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 1, 2001·No. No. C4-01-274·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed an application for suspension pursuant to Rule 12(c)(1), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, based on evidence that respondent cannot be found in the state or served personally with the Director’s petition for disciplinary action.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Mitchell Ross Ornstein be suspended from the practice of law. Within one year from the date of this order, respondent may move the court for vacation of the order of suspension and for leave to answer the petition for disciplinary action.

BY THE COURT

/s/ Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed an application for suspension pursuant to Rule 12(c)(1), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, based on evidence that respondent cannot be found in the state or served personally with the Director’s petition for disciplinary action.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Mitchell Ross Ornstein be suspended from the practice of law. Within one year from the date of this order, respondent may move the court for vacation of the order of suspension and for leave to answer the petition for disciplinary action.

BY THE COURT

/s/ Alan C. Page Associate Justice

In re Disciplinary Action Against Ornstein, 622 N.W.2d 560, 2001 Minn. LEXIS 139, 2001 WL 225709 (Mich. 2001).

Pincite

622 N.W.2d 560 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Ornstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related