In re Disciplinary Action Against O'Connor

554 N.W.2d 82, 1996 Minn. LEXIS 707, 1996 WL 612448
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided October 24, 1996·No. No. C2-96-807·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PAGE, Justice.

■WHEREAS, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition alleging that respondent David A. O’Connor committed unprofessional conduct in regard to the attorney fee charged in a matter; and

WHEREAS, following an answer to the petition by the respondent, this matter was heard by a referee appointed by this court who filed findings of fact, conclusions of law and a recommendation that the petition be dismissed, concluding that the matter was a good faith fee dispute between the parties; and

WHEREAS, the respondent and the Director have entered into a stipulation wherein they join in the recommendation of the referee that the petition be dismissed;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for disciplinary action against respondent David A. O’Connor is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Disciplinary Action Against O'Connor, 554 N.W.2d 82, 1996 Minn. LEXIS 707, 1996 WL 612448 (Mich. 1996).

554 N.W.2d 82 (In re Disciplinary Action Against O'Connor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.