In Re Disciplinary Action Against Nichols

766 N.W.2d 703, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 339, 2009 WL 1797628
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 18, 2009·No. A08-1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Lawrence Edward Nichols committed professional misconduct, namely, directing a threat at a prosecutor who met with respondent’s children in connection with a charge of domestic abuse against respondent, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(d). Respondent filed an answer disputing that he threatened the prosecutor. We referred the matter to a referee for findings of fact and recommendations for disposition. After a hearing, the referee found by clear and convincing evidence that respondent threatened the prosecutor.

Respondent waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility and, with the Director, stipulates that the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are conclusive. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended disposition.

Based on all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Lawrence Edward Nichols is publicly reprimanded. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, *704 RLPR, and shall further pay disbursements to be determined under the provisions of Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Nichols, 766 N.W.2d 703, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 339, 2009 WL 1797628 (Mich. 2009).

766 N.W.2d 703 (In Re Disciplinary Action Against Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Waite
782 N.W.2d 820 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2010)