In re Disciplinary Action Against Merlin
This text of 549 N.W.2d 625 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Merlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon the application of the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, pursuant to Rule 12(c)(1), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and upon evidence that respondent, Carol Sue Merlin, cannot be found in the state or served personally with the petition for disciplinary action,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law. Respondent has 1 year from the date of the filing of this order to move for vacation of the order for suspension and for leave to answer the disciplinary petition.
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
549 N.W.2d 625, 1996 Minn. LEXIS 433, 1996 WL 385404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-merlin-minn-1996.