In re Disciplinary Action Against Martin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Disciplinary Action Against Martin

723 N.W.2d 14, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 771, 2006 WL 3095543

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 25, 2006

DocketNo. A05-1650

StatusPublished

This text of 723 N.W.2d 14 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Disciplinary Action Against Martin, 723 N.W.2d 14, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 771, 2006 WL 3095543 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

By order filed on September 14, 2005, this court suspended respondent Richard H. Martin for 30 days, with reinstatement conditioned, among other things, upon respondent’s successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination within one year from the date of filing of the order. Although respondent was reinstated to active practice by order filed on December 29, 2005, respondent has not yet provided evidence of his successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination, as required by the September 14, 2005, order.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Richard H. Martin is suspended from the practice of law until such time as respondent provides evidence of successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Respondent’s suspension shall be effective 14 days from the date of this order. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR) and shall provide written notice of his suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Helen M. Meyer, Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

By order filed on September 14, 2005, this court suspended respondent Richard H. Martin for 30 days, with reinstatement conditioned, among other things, upon respondent’s successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination within one year from the date of filing of the order. Although respondent was reinstated to active practice by order filed on December 29, 2005, respondent has not yet provided evidence of his successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination, as required by the September 14, 2005, order.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Richard H. Martin is suspended from the practice of law until such time as respondent provides evidence of successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Respondent’s suspension shall be effective 14 days from the date of this order. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR) and shall provide written notice of his suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Helen M. Meyer, Associate Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

723 N.W.2d 14, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 771, 2006 WL 3095543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-martin-minn-2006.