In Re Disciplinary Action Against Lillie
This text of 707 N.W.2d 367 (In Re Disciplinary Action Against Lillie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent John Canfield Lillie, III, committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, misuse of legal correspondence in order to evade Department of Corrections rules, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(c) and (d).
Respondent admits his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives his rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is public *368 reprimand and payment of $900 in costs and disbursements pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.
This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent John Canfield Lillie, III,’ is publicly reprimanded and that he shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
707 N.W.2d 367, 2005 Minn. LEXIS 820, 2005 WL 3604053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-lillie-minn-2005.