In Re Disciplinary Action Against Jambor

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Jambor

627 N.W.2d 333, 2001 WL 664985

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 7, 2001

DocketC9-99-1192

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 627 N.W.2d 333 (In Re Disciplinary Action Against Jambor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Jambor, 627 N.W.2d 333, 2001 WL 664985 (Mich. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

AMENDED ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Daniel Francis Jambor has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, while on probation respondent failed to cooperate with disciplinary proceedings, engaged in a pattern of frivolous and retaliatory litigation, neglected client matters, failed to adequately communicate with his clients, failed to return a client file, failed to comply with stipulated agreements and a court order, and made false and misleading statements to clients and others in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4, 1.15(c), 1.16(d), 3.1, 3.2, 3.4(c) and (d), 4.1, 7.1, 7.5, 8.1(a)(3) and 8.4(c) and (d) and *334 Rule 25, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and the probation order.

Respondent admits his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives his rights under Rule 14, RLPR, and has entered into a stipulation with the Director wherein they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a 2-year suspension commencing June 29, 2001, with no waiver of the reinstatement hearing provided for in Rule 18, RLPR. The parties also recommend that reinstatement should be conditioned upon: (1) compliance with Rule 26, RLPR; (2) successful completion of the professional responsibility exam pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR; (3) satisfaction of the continuing legal education requirements pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR, and (4) payment of costs in the amount of $900 plus interest and disbursements in the amount of $974.50 pursuant to Rule 24(d), RLPR.

This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly-recommended disposition.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Daniel Francis Jambor is suspended from the practice of law for a period of 2 years commencing June 29, 2001, with reinstatement conditioned on the terms set forth above. Respondent shall pay $1,874.50 in costs and disbursements pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AMENDED ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Daniel Francis Jambor has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, while on probation respondent failed to cooperate with disciplinary proceedings, engaged in a pattern of frivolous and retaliatory litigation, neglected client matters, failed to adequately communicate with his clients, failed to return a client file, failed to comply with stipulated agreements and a court order, and made false and misleading statements to clients and others in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4, 1.15(c), 1.16(d), 3.1, 3.2, 3.4(c) and (d), 4.1, 7.1, 7.5, 8.1(a)(3) and 8.4(c) and (d) and *334 Rule 25, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and the probation order.

Respondent admits his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives his rights under Rule 14, RLPR, and has entered into a stipulation with the Director wherein they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a 2-year suspension commencing June 29, 2001, with no waiver of the reinstatement hearing provided for in Rule 18, RLPR. The parties also recommend that reinstatement should be conditioned upon: (1) compliance with Rule 26, RLPR; (2) successful completion of the professional responsibility exam pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR; (3) satisfaction of the continuing legal education requirements pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR, and (4) payment of costs in the amount of $900 plus interest and disbursements in the amount of $974.50 pursuant to Rule 24(d), RLPR.

This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly-recommended disposition.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Daniel Francis Jambor is suspended from the practice of law for a period of 2 years commencing June 29, 2001, with reinstatement conditioned on the terms set forth above. Respondent shall pay $1,874.50 in costs and disbursements pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

627 N.W.2d 333, 2001 WL 664985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-jambor-minn-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack