In Re Disciplinary Action Against Inglimo

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Inglimo

744 N.W.2d 376, 2008 Minn. LEXIS 60, 2008 WL 398848

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedFebruary 11, 2008

DocketA08-189

StatusPublished

This text of 744 N.W.2d 376 (In Re Disciplinary Action Against Inglimo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Inglimo, 744 N.W.2d 376, 2008 Minn. LEXIS 60, 2008 WL 398848 (Mich. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition seeking reciprocal discipline under Rule 12(d), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), based on an order of the Wisconsin Supreme Court suspending respondent Michael Robert Inglimo for a period of three years for illegal drug use with clients, engaging in sexual relations with a client’s wife, misuse of a client trust account, failure to maintain proper trust account records, and criminal conviction for possession of marijuana.

The Director and respondent have entered into a stipulation in which respondent admits the allegations of the petition for reciprocal discipline, admits his actions violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.7(b), 1.15(a), (e) and (g), 8.4(b), and 8.4(c), and waives his procedural rights under Rule 12(d), RLPR. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate reciprocal discipline is a three-year suspension, and that reinstatement be conditioned upon successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination, satisfaction of continuing legal education requirements under Rule 18(e), RLPR, and demonstration of fitness to practice under Rule 18(a)-(d), RLPR.

The Court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Michael Robert Inglimo is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law for not less than three years, effective as of the date of filing of this order, subject to the conditions set forth above. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals). Respondent shall pay $900 in costs under Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition seeking reciprocal discipline under Rule 12(d), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), based on an order of the Wisconsin Supreme Court suspending respondent Michael Robert Inglimo for a period of three years for illegal drug use with clients, engaging in sexual relations with a client’s wife, misuse of a client trust account, failure to maintain proper trust account records, and criminal conviction for possession of marijuana.

The Director and respondent have entered into a stipulation in which respondent admits the allegations of the petition for reciprocal discipline, admits his actions violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.7(b), 1.15(a), (e) and (g), 8.4(b), and 8.4(c), and waives his procedural rights under Rule 12(d), RLPR. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate reciprocal discipline is a three-year suspension, and that reinstatement be conditioned upon successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination, satisfaction of continuing legal education requirements under Rule 18(e), RLPR, and demonstration of fitness to practice under Rule 18(a)-(d), RLPR.

The Court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Michael Robert Inglimo is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law for not less than three years, effective as of the date of filing of this order, subject to the conditions set forth above. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals). Respondent shall pay $900 in costs under Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

744 N.W.2d 376, 2008 Minn. LEXIS 60, 2008 WL 398848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-inglimo-minn-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack