In re Disciplinary Action Against Heckmann

587 N.W.2d 291, 1999 WL 5336
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJanuary 5, 1999
DocketNo. C3-96-1755
StatusPublished

This text of 587 N.W.2d 291 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Heckmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Disciplinary Action Against Heckmann, 587 N.W.2d 291, 1999 WL 5336 (Mich. 1999).

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, by order dated January 2, 1997, this court indefinitely suspended respondent Timothy C. Heckmann from the practice of law and provided that he could not petition for reinstatement until the earlier of his admission to practice in Wisconsin or the expiration of five years; and

WHEREAS, after this court had issued its order, the Wisconsin Supreme Court made respondent ineligible for admission to the bar for a period of two years; and

WHEREAS, respondent has learned that even when the court-ordered two-year period of ineligibility in Wisconsin expires, he will not be eligible for admission in Wisconsin as long as his license to practice in Minnesota remains suspended, and, pursuant to this court’s order he will remain suspended for five years unless he is admitted in Wisconsin; and

WHEREAS, respondent now moves to amend this court’s January 2, 1997, suspension order to permit him to petition for reinstatement at the expiration of two years of suspension, even though he will not yet be admitted to practice in Wisconsin; and

WHEREAS, this motion is not opposed by the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of Timothy C. Heckmann to amend this court’s suspension order dated January 2, 1997, to permit him to petition for reinstatement at the expiration of two years of suspension even though he will not yet be admitted to practice in Wisconsin be, and hereby is granted, and the order is so amended.

BY THE COURT:

Alan C. Page

Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
587 N.W.2d 291, 1999 WL 5336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-heckmann-minn-1999.