In re Disciplinary Action Against Grigsby

822 N.W.2d 291, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 561
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 23, 2012
DocketNo. All-0976
StatusPublished

This text of 822 N.W.2d 291 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Grigsby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Disciplinary Action Against Grigsby, 822 N.W.2d 291, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 561 (Mich. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

In an opinion filed on July 11, 2012, we suspended respondent Stephen Vincent Grigsby from the practice of law for 60 days. In re Grigsby, 815 N.W.2d 836, 847 (Minn.2012). Respondent has filed an affidavit stating that he has fully complied with the terms of the suspension order, except for successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination, and requests reinstatement. The Director agrees that respondent has complied with the terms of the court’s July 11, 2012, opinion, except for successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Stephen Vincent Grigsby is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota, subject to his successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination by July 11, 2013. Respondent, however, remains on non-compliant status for failure to pay his lawyer registration fees, and he cannot practice law in Minnesota or hold himself out as authorized to practice law in Minnesota until he satisfies the conditions for reinstatement to active status. See Rule l.F, 2.H, 2.1, Rules on Lawyer Registration.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that by July 11, 2013, respondent shall comply with Rule 18(e)(3), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, by filing with the Clerk of Appellate Courts and serving upon the Director proof of respondent’s successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Failure to do so shall result in automatic re-suspension pending proof of successful completion of the examination.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Grigsby
815 N.W.2d 836 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
822 N.W.2d 291, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-grigsby-minn-2012.