In Re Disciplinary Action Against Grathwol

574 N.W.2d 70, 1998 Minn. LEXIS 570, 1998 WL 94944
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedFebruary 25, 1998
DocketC4-94-2196
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 574 N.W.2d 70 (In Re Disciplinary Action Against Grathwol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Grathwol, 574 N.W.2d 70, 1998 Minn. LEXIS 570, 1998 WL 94944 (Mich. 1998).

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for revocation of probation of respondent Timothy 0. Grathwol and imposition of additional public discipline on allegations that respondent has committed misconduct warranting public discipline, namely trust account overdrafts, failure to deposit retainer in trust account and to promptly return unearned retainer and misleading ethics investigator in regard to matter, failure to satisfy a judgment for a court reporter, failure to communicate with a client and return unearned fees and noncooperation with the Director’s investigation; and

WHEREAS, respondent has waived any rights he has pursuant to Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), unconditionally admits the allegations of the petition, and has entered into a stipulation with the Director wherein they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is an indefinite suspension with no right to apply for reinstatement for at least 12 months pursuant to Rule 15, RLPR, and with the requirement for a reinstatement hearing pursuant to Rule 18, RLPR, not waived. Reinstatement is further conditioned upon (1) payment of costs in the amount of $900 plus interest pursuant to Rule 24(d), RLPR; (2) compliance with Rule 26, RLPR; (3) successful completion of the professional responsibility examination pursuant to Rule 18(e); (4) satisfaction of the continuing legal education requirements pursuant to Rule 18(e), RLPR; (5) a demonstration by clear and convincing evidence of respondent’s psychological fitness to practice law; and (6) restitution to the following clients:

CLIENT AMOUNT
L.E. $314.05
J.G. 40.00
K.K. 50.00
A.L. 68.00
L.R. 10.00
K.T. 46.00
C.T. 50.00

Respondent agrees to submit any fee disputes concerning advance retainers to binding fee arbitration; and

WHEREAS, this court has independently reviewed the record and agrees with the jointly recommended disposition is appropriate,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Timothy O. Grathwol is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law for a minimum of 12 months with any reinstatement subject to the jointly agreed-to conditions set out above. Respondent shall pay costs of $900 plus interest to the Director pursuant to Rule 24(d), RLPR.

/s/ BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alan C. Page Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Disciplinary Action Against Taplin
837 N.W.2d 306 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2013)
In re Disciplinary Action Against Montez
812 N.W.2d 58 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2012)
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rebeau
787 N.W.2d 168 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2010)
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Overboe
745 N.W.2d 852 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
574 N.W.2d 70, 1998 Minn. LEXIS 570, 1998 WL 94944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-grathwol-minn-1998.