In Re Disciplinary Action Against Graham
This text of 744 N.W.2d 19 (In Re Disciplinary Action Against Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Gemma E. Graham committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, that she engaged in the unauthorized practice of law for a period of more than 20 years while on restricted status for failing to submit the affidavits of continuing legal education (CLE) compliance required by Rule 9 of the Rules of the Minnesota State Board of Continuing Legal Education, in violation of Rules 5.5 and 8.4(d), Minn. R. Prof. Conduct.
Respondent admits her conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, waives her procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director under which they jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand and two years of unsupervised probation.
This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Gemma E. Graham is publicly reprimanded and placed on two years of unsupervised probation effective as of the date of filing of this order. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
744 N.W.2d 19, 2008 Minn. LEXIS 43, 2008 WL 324828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-graham-minn-2008.