In re Disciplinary Action Against Getty

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Disciplinary Action Against Getty

511 N.W.2d 447, 1994 Minn. LEXIS 102, 1994 WL 37819

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedFebruary 1, 1994

DocketNo. C8-85-2372

StatusPublished

This text of 511 N.W.2d 447 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Getty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Disciplinary Action Against Getty, 511 N.W.2d 447, 1994 Minn. LEXIS 102, 1994 WL 37819 (Mich. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, and upon the petition of the Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, effective immediately, the respondent Paris Don-ray Getty, be and the same is, temporarily suspended pending final determination of these disciplinary proceedings, pursuant to Rule 16, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility. Respondent shall, within 5 days of the filing of this order, notify each of his clients of his inability to continue representation of the client and otherwise shall comply fully with the provisions of Rule 26 and Rule 27, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility.

/s/ M. Jeanne Coyne Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, and upon the petition of the Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, effective immediately, the respondent Paris Don-ray Getty, be and the same is, temporarily suspended pending final determination of these disciplinary proceedings, pursuant to Rule 16, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility. Respondent shall, within 5 days of the filing of this order, notify each of his clients of his inability to continue representation of the client and otherwise shall comply fully with the provisions of Rule 26 and Rule 27, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility.

/s/ M. Jeanne Coyne Associate Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

511 N.W.2d 447, 1994 Minn. LEXIS 102, 1994 WL 37819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-getty-minn-1994.