In re Disciplinary Action Against Fogel

812 N.W.2d 81, 2012 WL 1372071, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 147
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedApril 12, 2012
DocketNo. A12-0324
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 812 N.W.2d 81 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Fogel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Disciplinary Action Against Fogel, 812 N.W.2d 81, 2012 WL 1372071, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 147 (Mich. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a peti[82]*82tion for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Jonathan Jay Fogel committed professional misconduct, namely, failing to maintain the required trust account books, resulting in shortages in his trust account and the negligent misappropriation of client funds, erroneously processing non-client related transactions in his trust account, and failing to adequately supervise his nonlawyer trust accounting staff, resulting in possible theft of client funds, trust account shortages, and deficient trust account books and records, in violation of Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(a), (a)(1), (c)(3), and Appendix 1 thereto, and'5.3(a) and (b).

Respondent waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and unconditionally admits the allegations of the petition. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand and two years of probation during which respondent’s books and records will be available for the Director’s review.

The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings therein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Jonathan Jay Fogel is publicly reprimanded and placed on two years of probation subject to the following terms and conditions:

(a)Respondent shall cooperate fully with the Director’s Office in its efforts to monitor compliance with this probation. Respondent shall promptly respond to the Director’s correspondence by the due date. Respondent shall provide the Director with a current mailing address and shall immediately notify the Director of any change of address. Respondent shall cooperate with the Director’s investigation of any allegations of unprofessional conduct that may come to the Director’s attention. Upon the Director’s request, respondent shall authorize the release of information and documentation to verify compliance with the terms of this probation.
(b) Respondent shall abide by the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct.
(c) Respondent shall maintain law office and trust account books and records in compliance with Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.15 and Appendix 1, Minn. R. Prof. Conduct. These books and records in-elude the following: client subsidiary ledgers, checkbook register, monthly trial balances, monthly trust account reconciliation, bank statements, canceled checks, duplicate deposit slips, and bank reports of interest, service charges, and interest payments to the Minnesota IOLTA Program. Such books and records shall be made available to the Director within 30 days from the filing of this order and thereafter at such intervals as the Director deems necessary to determine compliance.

Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLRP.

BY THE COURT

/s/Alan C. Page .Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Klotz
909 N.W.2d 327 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
812 N.W.2d 81, 2012 WL 1372071, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-fogel-minn-2012.