In re Disciplinary Action Against Ek

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Disciplinary Action Against Ek

636 N.W.2d 794, 2000 Minn. LEXIS 757, 2000 WL 1836725

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 11, 2000·No. No. C3-00-2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed an application for suspension pursuant to Rule 12(c)(1), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, based upon evidence that respondent cannot be found in the state.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Charles Norman Ek be suspended from the practice of law. Within one year from the date of this order, respondent may move the court for vacation of the order of suspension and for leave to answer the petition for disciplinary action.

BY THE COURT

Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed an application for suspension pursuant to Rule 12(c)(1), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, based upon evidence that respondent cannot be found in the state.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Charles Norman Ek be suspended from the practice of law. Within one year from the date of this order, respondent may move the court for vacation of the order of suspension and for leave to answer the petition for disciplinary action.

BY THE COURT

Alan C. Page Associate Justice

In re Disciplinary Action Against Ek, 636 N.W.2d 794, 2000 Minn. LEXIS 757, 2000 WL 1836725 (Mich. 2000).

Pincite

636 N.W.2d 794 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Ek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.