In re Disciplinary Action Against Doyle

808 N.W.2d 31, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 791, 2011 WL 6938751
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 29, 2011·No. No. A11-1490·Published

Opinion

ORDER

By order filed on September 21, 2011, we suspended respondent Stephen Doyle from the practice of law for a minimum of 90 days, effective 14 days from the date of filing of the order. Respondent has filed an affidavit stating that he has fully complied with the terms of the suspension order, except for successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination, and requests reinstatement. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility does not oppose the request.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that effective January 3, 2012, respondent Stephen Doyle is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota, subject to his successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. By September 21, 2012, respondent shall file with the Clerk of Appellate Courts and serve upon the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility proof of successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Failure to do so shall result in automatic re-suspension, pending successful completion of the examination, pursuant to Rule 18(e)(3), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility.

[32] BY THE COURT:

[[Image here]]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Disciplinary Action Against Doyle, 808 N.W.2d 31, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 791, 2011 WL 6938751 (Mich. 2011).

808 N.W.2d 31 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Doyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.