In re Disciplinary Action Against Davis

824 N.W.2d 634, 2012 WL 6694071, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 688
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 20, 2012·No. No. A11-1089·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

By order filed on September 18, 2012, we indefinitely suspended respondent Willie Herman Davis, Jr., based on his failure to provide proof of his successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Respondent has filed an affidavit stating that he has fully complied with the terms of the suspension order, including successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. The Director has no objection to respondent’s reinstatement to the practice of law.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Willie Herman Davis, Jr., is reinstated to the practice of law effective as of the date of the filing of this order and is placed on unsupervised probation until October 17, 2014, subject to the conditions imposed by our October 17, 2007, order. See In re Davis, 740 N.W.2d 568, 568-69 (Minn.2007) (order).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Disciplinary Action Against Davis, 824 N.W.2d 634, 2012 WL 6694071, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 688 (Mich. 2012).

824 N.W.2d 634 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Disciplinary Action against Davis
846 N.W.2d 603 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2014)