In re Disciplinary Action Against Davis
This text of 824 N.W.2d 634 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
By order filed on September 18, 2012, we indefinitely suspended respondent Willie Herman Davis, Jr., based on his failure to provide proof of his successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Respondent has filed an affidavit stating that he has fully complied with the terms of the suspension order, including successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. The Director has no objection to respondent’s reinstatement to the practice of law.
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Willie Herman Davis, Jr., is reinstated to the practice of law effective as of the date of the filing of this order and is placed on unsupervised probation until October 17, 2014, subject to the conditions imposed by our October 17, 2007, order. See In re Davis, 740 N.W.2d 568, 568-69 (Minn.2007) (order).
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
824 N.W.2d 634, 2012 WL 6694071, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-davis-minn-2012.