In re Disciplinary Action Against Bottema

823 N.W.2d 626, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 562, 2012 WL 5355627
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided October 23, 2012·No. No. A12-1421·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action against respondent Kenneth M. Bottema. The Director has also filed an application for suspension under Rule 12(c)(1), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, based upon evidence that respondent cannot be found in the state to respond to the petition for disciplinary action.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Kenneth M. Bottema be, and the same is, suspended from the practice of law. Within one year from the date of this order, respondent may move the court for vacation of the order of suspension and for leave to answer the petition for disciplinary action. If respondent fails to appear in this matter within one year of the date of filing of this order, the allegations in the petition for disciplinary action shall be deemed admitted.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Disciplinary Action Against Bottema, 823 N.W.2d 626, 2012 Minn. LEXIS 562, 2012 WL 5355627 (Mich. 2012).

823 N.W.2d 626 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Bottema) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Disciplinary Action Against Bottema
844 N.W.2d 527 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2014)