In re Disciplinary Action Against Begeske

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Disciplinary Action Against Begeske

759 N.W.2d 217, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 4, 2009 WL 139895

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 14, 2009

DocketNo. A08-2013

StatusPublished

This text of 759 N.W.2d 217 (In re Disciplinary Action Against Begeske) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Disciplinary Action Against Begeske, 759 N.W.2d 217, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 4, 2009 WL 139895 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On December 2, 2008, the court suspended respondent Matthew K. Begeske from the practice of law for a period of 30 days. Respondent has filed' an affidavit stating that he has fully complied with the terms of the suspension order, except for successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination, and requests reinstatement. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility does not oppose the request.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Matthew K. Begeske is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota, subject to his successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination within one year of the December 2, 2008 suspension order, and is placed on supervised probation for a period of two years, subject to the terms and conditions stated in the December 2 order. Within one year from December 2, 2008, respondent shall file with the Clerk of Appellate Courts and serve upon the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility proof of successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Failure to do so shall result in automatic re-suspension, pending successful completion of the examination, pursuant to Rule 18(e)(3), RLPR.

BY THE COURT

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On December 2, 2008, the court suspended respondent Matthew K. Begeske from the practice of law for a period of 30 days. Respondent has filed' an affidavit stating that he has fully complied with the terms of the suspension order, except for successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination, and requests reinstatement. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility does not oppose the request.

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Matthew K. Begeske is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota, subject to his successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination within one year of the December 2, 2008 suspension order, and is placed on supervised probation for a period of two years, subject to the terms and conditions stated in the December 2 order. Within one year from December 2, 2008, respondent shall file with the Clerk of Appellate Courts and serve upon the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility proof of successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Failure to do so shall result in automatic re-suspension, pending successful completion of the examination, pursuant to Rule 18(e)(3), RLPR.

BY THE COURT

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

759 N.W.2d 217, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 4, 2009 WL 139895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-begeske-minn-2009.