In re Disbarment of Siegel

422 U.S. 1004, 95 S. Ct. 2626, 45 L. Ed. 2d 667, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 1974
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 16, 1975·No. No. D-41·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

It having been reported to this Court that George J. Siegel, of New York, N. Y., has been disbarred from the practice of law in all of the courts of the State of New York, and this Court by order of February 24, 1975 [420 U. S. 941], having suspended the said George J. Siegel from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

It is ordered that the said George J. Siegel, be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Disbarment of Siegel, 422 U.S. 1004, 95 S. Ct. 2626, 45 L. Ed. 2d 667, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 1974 (1975).

422 U.S. 1004 (In re Disbarment of Siegel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ball v. State
699 A.2d 1170 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1997)
Snyder v. Charlotte Public School District
365 N.W.2d 151 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1985)
Brenda Crawford, Etc. v. Edwin L. Pittman
708 F.2d 1028 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
Powell v. Schweiker
688 F.2d 1357 (Eleventh Circuit, 1982)
Burko v. State
349 A.2d 355 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1975)