In re Disbarment of Rubin

Supreme Court

In re Disbarment of Rubin

424 U.S. 938

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 1, 1976·No. No. D-50·Published

Opinion

It having been reported to the Court that Franklin D. Rubin, of Philadelphia, Pa., has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, and this Court by order of October 6, 1975 [423 U. S. 811], having suspended the said Franklin D. Rubin from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent, and that the time within which to file a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Franklin D. Rubin be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the role of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It having been reported to the Court that Franklin D. Rubin, of Philadelphia, Pa., has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, and this Court by order of October 6, 1975 [423 U. S. 811], having suspended the said Franklin D. Rubin from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent, and that the time within which to file a response has expired;

It is ordered that the said Franklin D. Rubin be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the role of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

In re Disbarment of Rubin, 424 U.S. 938 (1976).

Pincite

424 U.S. 938 (In re Disbarment of Rubin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.