In re Disbarment of McCullough

Supreme Court

In re Disbarment of McCullough

390 U.S. 902

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 22, 1968

DocketNo. 180

StatusPublished

This text of 390 U.S. 902 (In re Disbarment of McCullough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Disbarment of McCullough, 390 U.S. 902 (1968).

Pincite

Opinion

It having been reported to the Court that James M. McCullough of Chevy Chase, State of Maryland, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, duly entered on the 11th day of May, 1967, and this Court by order of June 5, 1967, having suspended the said James M. McCullough from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent, and that the time within which to file a return to the rule has expired;

It Is Ordered that the said James M. McCullough be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It having been reported to the Court that James M. McCullough of Chevy Chase, State of Maryland, has been disbarred from the practice of law by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, duly entered on the 11th day of May, 1967, and this Court by order of June 5, 1967, having suspended the said James M. McCullough from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent, and that the time within which to file a return to the rule has expired;

It Is Ordered that the said James M. McCullough be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

390 U.S. 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disbarment-of-mccullough-scotus-1968.