In Re Disbarment of Larson

210 N.W. 865, 169 Minn. 194, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1419
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided November 19, 1926·No. No. 25,619.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The Hennepin County Bar Association asks for the disbarment of V. L. Larson. Honorable W. A. Schultz, one of the judges of the First judicial district, was appointed referee to take the evidence, and make findings of fact, which have been made, and which being sustained by the evidence we now adopt.

Respondent was delinquent in remitting to his client money collected. Some of it was remitted after these proceedings were instituted though about a year after it was received. Such conduct is of course inherently wrong. It also destroys public confidence in the profession. Attorneys, especially, know that such conduct is both legally and morally wrong. Attorneys should not collect or handle their clients’ money if they do not have the integrity and personal ability to promptly pass it on to the owner. There can be but one result. The activity of the petitioning association is commendable.

Formal judgment of disbarment will be entered removing V, L. Larson from his office of attorney at law in this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Disbarment of Larson, 210 N.W. 865, 169 Minn. 194, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1419 (Mich. 1926).

210 N.W. 865 (In Re Disbarment of Larson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Spillman v. Priest
242 N.W. 433 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1932)
In Re Disbarment of Comfort
230 N.W. 582 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1930)
In Re Disbarment of Basil T. Heath
227 N.W. 892 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1929)
In Re Disbarment of Howard S. Spencer
215 N.W. 191 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1927)
In Re Disbarment of George E. Ericson
213 N.W. 556 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1927)