In re Disbarment of Hankinson

W.D. Pennsylvania

In re Disbarment of Hankinson

421 U.S. 959, 95 S. Ct. 1946

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 12, 1975

DocketNo. D-37

StatusPublished

This text of 421 U.S. 959 (In re Disbarment of Hankinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Disbarment of Hankinson, 421 U.S. 959, 95 S. Ct. 1946 (1975).

Pincite

Opinion

It having been reported to this Court that Christopher Ker Hankinson, of Vienna, Va., has been disbarred- from the practice of law in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and in the United States District Court for the District of Colum[960]*960bia, and this Court by order of January 20, 1975 [419 U. S. 1119], having suspended the said Christopher Ker Hankinson from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time within which to file a return has expired;

It is ordered that the said Christopher Ker Hankinson be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It having been reported to this Court that Christopher Ker Hankinson, of Vienna, Va., has been disbarred- from the practice of law in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and in the United States District Court for the District of Colum[960]*960bia, and this Court by order of January 20, 1975 [419 U. S. 1119], having suspended the said Christopher Ker Hankinson from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent and that the time within which to file a return has expired;

It is ordered that the said Christopher Ker Hankinson be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

421 U.S. 959, 95 S. Ct. 1946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disbarment-of-hankinson-pawd-1975.