In re Disbarment of Freel

Supreme Court

In re Disbarment of Freel

404 U.S. 1056, 92 S. Ct. 730

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 24, 1972

DocketNo. A-521

StatusPublished

This text of 404 U.S. 1056 (In re Disbarment of Freel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Disbarment of Freel, 404 U.S. 1056, 92 S. Ct. 730 (1972).

Pincite

Opinion

It having been reported to the Court that Frederick J. Freel, of Kansas City, Missouri, has been indefinitely suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Missouri, duly entered April 15, 1971, and this Court by order of November 22, 1971 [ante, p. 963], having suspended the said Frederick J. Freel from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent, and that a response has been filed;

It Is Ordered that the said Frederick J. Freel be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It having been reported to the Court that Frederick J. Freel, of Kansas City, Missouri, has been indefinitely suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme Court of Missouri, duly entered April 15, 1971, and this Court by order of November 22, 1971 [ante, p. 963], having suspended the said Frederick J. Freel from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent, and that a response has been filed;

It Is Ordered that the said Frederick J. Freel be, and he is hereby, disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

404 U.S. 1056, 92 S. Ct. 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disbarment-of-freel-scotus-1972.