In Re Disbarment of Edwin L. MacLean

263 N.W. 906, 196 Minn. 5, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 1057
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedDecember 20, 1935
DocketNo. 30,164.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 263 N.W. 906 (In Re Disbarment of Edwin L. MacLean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Disbarment of Edwin L. MacLean, 263 N.W. 906, 196 Minn. 5, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 1057 (Mich. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Proceedings instituted by the state board of law examiners, petitioner, for the discipline of one Edwin L. MacLean, respondent, a Minneapolis attorney.

Respondent in October, 1932, was indicted for forgery, a felony, by a grand jury. He pleaded not guilty, was tried, found guilty, and sentenced to confinement in' Stillwater. On appeal the conviction was affirmed by this court in State v. MacLean, 192 Minn. 96, 255 N. W. 821. This conviction is urged as a ground for the removal of respondent as an attorney.

1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 5697, provides for the removal or suspension of an attorney “upon his being convicted of a felony, or of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude.” The crime of forgery is a felony under the laws of Minnesota and clearly within the purview of this section.

We have carefully considered all the circumstances urged by the respondent as extenuating, but in light of the statute quoted above and the undisputed facts, this court has no alternative but *6 to disbar respondent on the ground of conviction for felony. In re Disbarment of Moses, 186 Minn. 357, 243 N. W. 386.

It is unnecessary to consider the other ground urged as a basis for this action.

Respondent must be disbarred.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Disbarment of Arthur E. Olson
267 N.W. 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 N.W. 906, 196 Minn. 5, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 1057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disbarment-of-edwin-l-maclean-minn-1935.