In Re Disbarment of Edwin L. MacLean
This text of 263 N.W. 906 (In Re Disbarment of Edwin L. MacLean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Proceedings instituted by the state board of law examiners, petitioner, for the discipline of one Edwin L. MacLean, respondent, a Minneapolis attorney.
Respondent in October, 1932, was indicted for forgery, a felony, by a grand jury. He pleaded not guilty, was tried, found guilty, and sentenced to confinement in' Stillwater. On appeal the conviction was affirmed by this court in State v. MacLean, 192 Minn. 96, 255 N. W. 821. This conviction is urged as a ground for the removal of respondent as an attorney.
1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 5697, provides for the removal or suspension of an attorney “upon his being convicted of a felony, or of a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude.” The crime of forgery is a felony under the laws of Minnesota and clearly within the purview of this section.
We have carefully considered all the circumstances urged by the respondent as extenuating, but in light of the statute quoted above and the undisputed facts, this court has no alternative but *6 to disbar respondent on the ground of conviction for felony. In re Disbarment of Moses, 186 Minn. 357, 243 N. W. 386.
It is unnecessary to consider the other ground urged as a basis for this action.
Respondent must be disbarred.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 N.W. 906, 196 Minn. 5, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 1057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disbarment-of-edwin-l-maclean-minn-1935.