In Re Disbarment of Andrew Nelson

209 N.W. 316, 167 Minn. 467, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1355
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJune 11, 1926
DocketNo. 24,950.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 N.W. 316 (In Re Disbarment of Andrew Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Disbarment of Andrew Nelson, 209 N.W. 316, 167 Minn. 467, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1355 (Mich. 1926).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The accusation of professional misconduct lodged against respondent by the Board of Law Examiners was referred to Honorable Charles Bechhoefer, one of the judges of the district court for Ramsey county. After hearing the evidence, he has made findings which in all things acquit respondent of the charge in question. Our examination of the record has led to the conclusion not only that the findings are sustained but also that the evidence would not warrant the contrary result. The judgment of the court therefore is that respondent be and he is hereby found not guilty of the charges made in the accusation and that he be and is hereby acquitted of the same and all thereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Simmonds
415 N.W.2d 673 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 N.W. 316, 167 Minn. 467, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disbarment-of-andrew-nelson-minn-1926.