In re Disbarment of Anderson

Supreme Court of Kansas

In re Disbarment of Anderson

251 P. 1088, 122 Kan. 394, 1927 Kan. LEXIS 42

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJanuary 8, 1927

DocketNo. 27,039

StatusPublished

This text of 251 P. 1088 (In re Disbarment of Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Disbarment of Anderson, 251 P. 1088, 122 Kan. 394, 1927 Kan. LEXIS 42 (kan 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

This is a disbarment proceeding filed against the accused by the state board of law examiners March 19, 1926. The complaint contained various charges of dishonorable and nonprofessional conduct on the part of the accused, among which were soliciting business and fraud and deceit.

The Hon. Plenderson Martin, of Lawrence, was appointed commissioner, heard evidence, made a painstaking personal examination into all the charges touching the conduct of the accused, and reported thereon. The matter was ably presented on oral argument and has had careful consideration in all its details. A recapitulation of the evidence and commissioner’s report is not necessary and would serve no useful purpose. The charges are fully sustained, and it is proper that an order of disbarment of the accused from the practice of law in this state should be entered.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

This is a disbarment proceeding filed against the accused by the state board of law examiners March 19, 1926. The complaint contained various charges of dishonorable and nonprofessional conduct on the part of the accused, among which were soliciting business and fraud and deceit.

The Hon. Plenderson Martin, of Lawrence, was appointed commissioner, heard evidence, made a painstaking personal examination into all the charges touching the conduct of the accused, and reported thereon. The matter was ably presented on oral argument and has had careful consideration in all its details. A recapitulation of the evidence and commissioner’s report is not necessary and would serve no useful purpose. The charges are fully sustained, and it is proper that an order of disbarment of the accused from the practice of law in this state should be entered.

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 P. 1088, 122 Kan. 394, 1927 Kan. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disbarment-of-anderson-kan-1927.