In Re Disbarment of Alfred H. Beach

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In Re Disbarment of Alfred H. Beach

231 N.W. 241, 180 Minn. 557, 1930 Minn. LEXIS 1285

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 13, 1930

DocketNo. 27,919.

StatusPublished

This text of 231 N.W. 241 (In Re Disbarment of Alfred H. Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Disbarment of Alfred H. Beach, 231 N.W. 241, 180 Minn. 557, 1930 Minn. LEXIS 1285 (Mich. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this proceeding for the disbarment of an attorney instituted by the board of law examiners, the findings of the referee, Honorable John W. Boerner, a judge of the district court for the second judicial district, establish that in 1924 the accused, Alfred Holmes Beach, was convicted in United States district court for the district of Minnesota, fourth division, of the crime of soliciting and receiving $300 as a bribe “with intent then and there to influence” his official action as legal adviser to and chairman of the board of appeals of the United States veterans bureau of district No. 10. Defendant appealed to the circuit court of appeals of the eighth cir *558 cuit where the judgment of conviction was affirmed. Beach v. U. S. 19 F. (2d) 739. The accused has thus been found guilty of misconduct for which judgment of disbarment' must be entered. -

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this proceeding for the disbarment of an attorney instituted by the board of law examiners, the findings of the referee, Honorable John W. Boerner, a judge of the district court for the second judicial district, establish that in 1924 the accused, Alfred Holmes Beach, was convicted in United States district court for the district of Minnesota, fourth division, of the crime of soliciting and receiving $300 as a bribe “with intent then and there to influence” his official action as legal adviser to and chairman of the board of appeals of the United States veterans bureau of district No. 10. Defendant appealed to the circuit court of appeals of the eighth cir *558 cuit where the judgment of conviction was affirmed. Beach v. U. S. 19 F. (2d) 739. The accused has thus been found guilty of misconduct for which judgment of disbarment' must be entered. -

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 N.W. 241, 180 Minn. 557, 1930 Minn. LEXIS 1285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disbarment-of-alfred-h-beach-minn-1930.