In re Dionne W.

267 A.D.2d 1096, 701 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13923
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1999·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Although it appears that petitions seeking termination of parental rights based on permanent neglect and mental illness-were filed concurrently and that the hearings encompassed both petitions, the only order contained in the record terminated respondent’s rights based on a finding that, because of mental illness, respondent was presently and for the foreseeable future unable to care for her children. There is no merit to respondent’s contention that Family Court should have ordered a suspended judgment. A suspended judgment is a dispositional alternative upon a finding of permanent neglect (see, Family Ct Act § 631). There is no statutory provision providing for a suspended judgment when parental rights are terminated based on mental illness (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [3] [g]; [4] [c]). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Rosa, J. — Terminate Parental Rights.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Scudder, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Dionne W., 267 A.D.2d 1096, 701 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 1096 (In re Dionne W.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Jackalyne WW. (Kevin VV.)
2021 NY Slip Op 03497 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Matilda B. (Gerald B.)
2020 NY Slip Op 05663 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
In re Ernesto Thomas A. New York Foundling Hospital
5 A.D.3d 380 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)