in Re Diogu Kalu Diogu II
This text of in Re Diogu Kalu Diogu II (in Re Diogu Kalu Diogu II) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed June 2, 2016.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-16-00373-CV
IN RE DIOGU KALU DIOGU II, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 14-DCV-214343
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 9, 2016, relator Diogu Kalu Diogu II filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Chad Bridges, presiding judge of the 240th District Court of Fort Bend County, to vacate his September 23, 2015 order that sets aside the default judgment and grants a new trial.
Mandamus review is not available for an order that sets aside a default judgment when there has been no jury trial. See In re Cort, No. 14–14–00646–CV, 2014 WL 4416074, at *2 (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 9, 2014, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.); In re Abrokwa, No. 05–15–01239–CV, 2015 WL 6520083, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 28, 2015, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); and In re Procesos Especializados en Metal, S.A. de C.V., No. 04–14–00543– CV, 2014 WL 4347724, at *3 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Sept. 3, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices McCally and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Diogu Kalu Diogu II, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-diogu-kalu-diogu-ii-texapp-2016.