In re Dinki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Dinki

253 A.D.2d 154, 689 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3118

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 19, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D.2d 154 (In re Dinki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Dinki, 253 A.D.2d 154, 689 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3118 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on September 10, 1976, and formerly maintained an office in Williamsville. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with three counts of professional misconduct.

Respondent has admitted the material allegations of the petition.

In mitigation, we note respondent’s prior unblemished record and that no client suffered a financial loss as a result of [155]*155respondent’s misconduct. Accordingly, we conclude that respondent should be censured.

Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Order of censure entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI