In re Dimond's Estate

156 N.Y.S. 268
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedOctober 30, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 156 N.Y.S. 268 (In re Dimond's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Dimond's Estate, 156 N.Y.S. 268 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1914).

Opinion

FOWLER, S.

As the trustees are not entitled to commissions on the value of unsold real property constituting a part of the trust estate held by them (Phoenix v. Livingston, 101 N. Y. 451, 5 N. E. 70), the value of that real property cannot be considered in determining whether the principal of the trust estate is $100,000 or over, so as to entitle two trustees to full commissions (Chisolm v. Hamersley, 114 App. Div. 565, 100 N. Y. Supp. 38). But one full commission will be allowed the accountants, to be divided between them.

The objections to the account are sustained and the decree to be presented will surcharge the trustees with the sum of $1,364.05. Proceed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phoenix v. . Livingston
5 N.E. 70 (New York Court of Appeals, 1886)
Chisolm v. Hamersley
114 A.D. 565 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 N.Y.S. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dimonds-estate-nysurct-1914.